Robert Hyma
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Library
    • Short Stories
    • Graphics and Logos
    • Playlists
  • About
  • Contact
  • Portfolio
Tag:

college

| Weekly Post-Eds |

Weekly Post-Ed #67

by Robert Hyma March 27, 2024
written by Robert Hyma

IN THE THICK OF IT

This will be a short and sweet Weekly Post-Ed. I’m in the middle of writing the final portion of my thesis and the deadline is next week Wednesday (!!). I’ll have much to comment on this thesis after the deadline passes, but one lesson has been painfully learned from embarking on this final project: In doing difficult things, all the parts about oneself that have remained easily hidden or ignored comes into the light.

And it ain’t pretty.

There’s a laundry list of characteristics for what I mean by this, but my God—I overestimated the effectiveness of all the organizational skills and personal talent that makes up for much of my work ethic. Grinding through this thesis has been an uncomfortable confrontation with many of my creative shortcomings. It’s been a cathartic and fulfilling experience–don’t get my wrong–but the ouch of this realization hasn’t worn off yet. I’ll be in the middle of it until the deadline next week, but one thing is clear going forward: My creative process could use a tune up.

I’ll be more specific in the coming weeks about my experiences. It’s an uplifting kind of thing, not to worry. Until then, send help in the guise of your comments–they help a lot.

***

ROBERT HYMA CASSEROLE

It’s not very often that a Weekly Post-Ed falls on one’s birthday, which is what today is.

Happy 35th birthday to me

*Holds for stadium applause*

Every year, it seems, I reflect on my life and what it feels like to be yet another year older. There isn’t a significant difference year to year, but sometimes reflecting on age comes up in unexpected places. In class a few weeks ago, the topic of my age came up and I told the truth. I’ve found that if the topic of my age comes up in college, I’m naturally asked as a followup, “What does it feel like to be in your 30s?”

It’s a silly question once you get into your 30s. What does it feel like? Being one’s thirties.

It’s like asking a tree, “What is it like to be a tree?”

And the tree responds, “Like tree. It feels like tree.”

Once you get there, you know. But it’s also disappointing to get older. There’s often no identifiable ribbon of achievement other than the dirge of wrinkles and slightly less elastic skin. Being in one’s thirties feels the same as one’s twenties–only, the number is printed higher than one feels. I feel just as mentally competent and sharp as I did in my twenties, with a sense of identity that hasn’t shifted all that much. The only difference has been a slew of new life experiences to add to the catalogue of what it means to be Robert Hyma.

I suppose that’s the difference: Experiences.

Really, age isn’t something trackable other than a number. What often changes is experiences, which is something added to the dish being prepared.

The best I can describe it, experience feels like something. I, Robert Hyma, don’t feel any different than I did a decade ago (as I’ve said), but there is a difference–one that I can feel. It’s like eating your favorite dish but someone added extra salt to it. Depending how you felt about the dish, maybe the extra salt helps. Or, maybe it makes the dish too bitter now. But there’s nothing to be done about it now: Someone added the salt (experiences) and that’s what the dish tastes like now.

Optimistically, it’s an amount of salt that doesn’t make or break the dish. It’s extra and can be ignored if you like, but you know it’s there if one is really straining to taste the extra pinch of salt.

Experience, then, is just an added neutral ingredient to age. I’m still me at 35—a dish called Robert Hyma Casserole (for better or worse)—but I’m also a bit of something else I can’t quite describe, lest I ask the cook what else was put into the main course this time around.

And on this particular iteration of Robert Hyma Casserole (my birthday, I mean, if I’m being too abstract), I’d rather not know if what I’m tasting is an extra pinch of salt. Right now, I like the dish.

It tastes just right. I wouldn’t change a thing.

***

ANY BIRTHDAY WISHES?

The most “old person” behavior in my adult life (that’s convenient enough for me to list, of course) is that I complain about my birthday like a crotchety geriatric that says, “I don’t want anything for my birthday!”

It’s true: I’ve reached a sum total of life pleasantries that I don’t need pine for anything more (outside of snap-decision items I purchase on a whim like fresh socks or elastic shoe strings–I’m not a monster, after all). And I realize my privilege by being in this position: There are many who don’t have the luxury of shrugging when family and friends ask what they can do for your birthday. Outside of some birthday gathering (in which I still assume the role of crotchety geriatric:
How long is party supposed to last?!”), I truly want nothing.

A birthday with nothing isn’t grounds for a pity party–it’s a celebration of just being. For once.

Which is what I really want for my birthday this year.

“To feel like tree,” a tree might say.

That’s what I want for me. And for you.

“Tree” as much as you need to “tree” today.

***

  1. “Open Up Wide” by Dizzy
  2. “Best Interests” by carmanah
  3. “She’s Too Cool for You” by Audio Book Club

***

Wishing everyone as well as you can be. You’re not alone out there,

March 27, 2024 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
| Weekly Post-Eds |

Weekly Post-Ed #66

by Robert Hyma March 20, 2024
written by Robert Hyma

A NEW GAME TO PLAY

Over the past two weeks, I’ve been cold-approaching women in public. Cold-approaching is a term used in the pickup artist community; it means to go up to a person and begin a conversation. Ever since I started reading Neil Strauss’s The Game: Penetrating the Secret Society of Pickup Artists, I’ve been fascinated with all the things I never knew about being social (as opposed to the psychological toolkit proffered by pickup artists to optimally seduce women).

Courtesy of Amazon

I don’t fancy myself as someone who wishes to seduce (or could pull off the sorts of magic tricks, blatant techniques offered in the book).

But the social-skill aspect of approaching people…That has been fascinating to experiment with.

Some background: I wouldn’t call myself socially inept. I’m not clueless with how to speak to others, even women. Like many creative types, I’m predisposed to an introvert’s lifestyle, finding pleasure in time alone with hobbies/projects than seeking the battery refill of social interaction. That being said, when it comes to speaking to others, I have a fairly rote set of skills that aren’t up-to-date. Much of what I learned involves asking open-ended questions and keeping someone else talking. This is fine if my intention was small talk, or a polite conversation with a stranger, but when it comes to a more meaningful connection, asking questions is like a table with only three legs—it can stand upright but, you know, just barely.

The problem with wanting to test new social skills as someone older is there isn’t a steady place to practice. In my situation, I happen to have a burgeoning college campus full of students just waiting to be spoken with. So, setting out to try a few lessons from Neil Strauss’s book, I set out to test my skills this past week.

***

THE TOOLKIT

The first step was to apply a few useful tips from Strauss’s book. In no particular order, I sought to do the following:

Have an Opener: Really, just a rehearsed scenario that I could begin a conversation with. Here’s what I used:

“Hi, let me get your opinion on this. My sister’s birthday is coming up and I’m buying her a shirt she’s been wanting. I’m not sure if she’s a small or a medium, which size should I go with?”

It’s a solid opener because it invites a casual response (something that isn’t too difficult to have an opinion about) and appears harmless. It’s disarming and allows me to convey confidence in approaching a perfect stranger about this dilemma.

Set a Time Frame: Don’t just approach someone and gab on about something you’d like their opinion on. Most likely, a stranger is thinking two things when you approach: What does this person want, and how long are they staying around? So, to mitigate one of these concerns, it’s a good idea to disarm the concern that you’re not about to leave with a statement of how long you intend to stick around.

I used this one since I was on campus: “I only have a few minutes and then I have to get to my next class.”

I was skeptical that this would be so impactful, but I could see the tension drop away. A time frame was relieving. Who knew?

Don’t be Results Dependent: A huge problem with my previous social interactions has been expecting a certain result: exchanging phone numbers, assurance of a followup interection, acknowledgment that I was the most perfect man and how could I have not come along sooner…

(You can see some of the psychology for why it’s been a struggle. I haven’t, as Esther Peral famously prescribed, “calibrated expectations”.

With strangers, frankly anyone, I wanted to be the most likeable person who could win their affections. If you’ve tried this before, the results are obvious: If you’re desperate to be liked, not only do you appear disingenuous, but will fail miserably. Desperation is potent like Body Odor or blood in the water—people have a sense for it and it isn’t desired. Not socially, at least.

Letting go of results also takes away the pressure of approaching others—simply saying a few lines, playing with the conversation, and then saying, “Thanks. Nice to meet you,” are all acceptable ways of ending things if it isn’t going well.

And many times, things going poorly is as much about luck and chemistry as it is about social prowess.

Speak in Statements: Statements are the language of intimacy, I’ve come to realize. Statements take a stand. Friends talk to each other in statements. In fact, I’d wager the reason we love and care for our favorite heroes in stories is because they mostly speak in statements. It’s simply the door opening to the soul.

Questions are interrogative, like being on a job interview. I’m a great listener and question asker, which isn’t surprising—the writer in me is a natural investigative journalist. But being a great question-asker also means I don’t participate in conversation. Asking questions, I’ve realized, means I’m not offering anything to the conversation about myself. Essentially, I’m hiding behind the lopsided expectation that others should speak and I can sit back and watch them—like an audience. Is it surprising, then, that I’m the one to fall in love with others instead of their falling in love with me?

Of course: They’ve been making statements and have demonstrated character, while I’ve been most often anonymous and asking questions.

With this toolkit memorized, I set out to talk to women on campus.

***

IN THE FIELD

If the pieces of advice I listed above seemed intuitive enough, putting them into practice was a completely different experience. For example, I had not taken into account the entire lifetime of built up social fears and belief systems that made it impossible not to flounder on the first few approaches.

My first approach was with a fashion designer at a coffee shop. She had been reading a book about entrepreneurship and I started with a question, “What are you reading?”

She answered. I couldn’t recall what she said because I was petrified. Up close, she was prettier than I had anticipated. Everything I had coached myself to try had gone out the window. So, I reverted to my default social ability: I asked interview questions.

“Are you looking to start a business?”

“What other things have you designed?”

“Is this for college?”

On and on and on about her fashion dreams. And me? Nothing to report—I didn’t say anything about myself. I could have been an undercover IRS agent for all she knew, which is about how she looked at me after the fifth or sixth question. To my credit, though, I recognized the conversation wasn’t going well—certainly not organically—so I thanked her for her time and said it was nice to meet her.

A class crash and burn, but also a start of something. Where I might have just walked past this person’s table, I stopped and attempted a conversation. So, at least a passing grade with a first attempt.

Partial credit is better than none.

The second interaction this past week was on campus. Spotting a girl sitting in the warm sunlight outside of the library, I approached with an opener I had been turning over in my head. I mustered up the courage and then approached to say:

“Hi, I could really use your opinion on this. My friend was dumped by his girlfriend a few weeks ago, and he keeps texting me that he needs closure in order to move on. Should he text her about what happened?”

Ok, maybe a little too autobiographical for complete comfort, but it worked. She told me that it was never a good idea to try to get back or ask for closure with an ex (a sensible and correct answer). I asked if she’s ever had guys try to contact her after a breakup. She said no and that her mother always steered her right on these matters.

“Help my friend out,” I said, feeling more confident after sensing things were going well. “If you’re being approached by a guy, how should he come up to you?”

She thought for a moment and said, “Not like this. If I’m at a library, I’m working on something. At a coffee house, I’m just trying to get away and have a cup of coffee, maybe read.. If I want to meet a guy, I’ll go to a bar or to a club and go dancing. It makes sense to come up to me there. Anywhere else and it isn’t organic.”

I was surprised by her answer, organic. “You wouldn’t want to be approached at the library? Even if it was Downey Jr. coming up to you?”

She smiled. “Well, that’s different.”

I laughed. “Ok. So, at a bar or a club. Is that where you meet guys?”

She dropped her smile. “Oh, I’m not 21. But, yeah, that’s how I would want to meet guys.”

Ouch, that age difference between her and I. Yes, it was time for me to leave. “Well, I have to run to class, but thank you—I’ll tell my friend what you said.”

“Hey, what class are you going to?”

I smiled. Yes, the hook; the point where she’s interested and asks a question about me. I hadn’t expected this moment, but was flattered that it had come. Too bad the age gap between us was about 13-14 years—something I’m not willing to pursue. I said a class, the lie was white and innocent, and I took my leave.

And gave myself full credit as I walked on.

***

DRUNK TESTING

Whether cold-approaching does anything for my social life, the jury is still out. It’s true that I have more confidence since trying some of the approaches from Neil Strauss’s book, but this could also be an uptick in confidence due to experience. I’m not convinced that any of these prescribed techniques works for me specifically, but I am also at a crossroads in life and trying something new is entirely worthwhile.

The process of cold-approaching, like anything that’s been worth doing in my life, has been the most fun anyways.

Over the weekend, I travelled to Detroit to visit a few friends. I talked about cold-approaching at an Irish pub, and after a few Guinness’s each, we each took turns pretending to cold-approach the table as though we were striking up a conversation with a bunch of strangers. Each attempt was more ridiculous than the last, and we never were convincing to one another. It didn’t matter—after every try, we all sat down to laugh at how ridiculous we looked and sounded. It was great fun.

I realized on the drive back to my friends’ apartment that the fun rested entirely in the aftermath of any of this cold-approaching business. It was never about being successful with women or being considered a social darling—it was all about the fun of having an experience and sharing it with some close friends. We were all drunk, having a great time, and there wasn’t much else that mattered (besides getting home safe).

I’ll have to test some more in the coming weeks, but I did discover a new technique for mitigating the anxiety of approaching others: When one is hungover with blistering headache, there isn’t much energy left to care about how socially graceful you are.

So cheers to me and you, my friend: To more adventures, wherever they may be.

***

Justin Timberlake’s “Everything I Ever Thought It Was” album, courtesy of Spotify

Justin Timberlake’s new album “Everything I Ever Thought It Was” album released over the past week. It’s wonderful. Everyone should have a listen. I’ll listen the three tracks I’ve had on repeat, but the album is truly a work of renown.

In a sweeping series of promotions, Justin Timberlake also featured on NPR’s Tiny Desk Concert series, reprising some golden favorites. It’s a fantastic use of 25-minutes of your life to give it a watch. I’ll include a link.

  1. “No Angels”
  2. “Sanctified (feat. Toby Nwigwe)”
  3. “Selfish”

***

Wishing everyone as well as you can be. You’re not alone out there,

March 20, 2024 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
| Weekly Post-Eds |

Weekly Post-Ed #65

by Robert Hyma March 6, 2024
written by Robert Hyma

SEASONS CHANGE

In the past week, the temperature in West Michigan rose to 72 degrees in Allendale, and dipped to below freezing with mild snow showers the very next day. It was the most bipolar weather conditions I’ve seen in winter here. Things have normalized since then, thankfully, but it was a sign of seasons changing: This Sunday the clocks roll forward an hour for Daylight Savings Time, March 19 is the first day of spring, and in three weeks I’ll be turning 35-years-old.

Seasons are changing.

In a month in a half, I will have graduated with a Bachelor’s degree in English Literature, launching into a new season of my life. Perhaps this is a characteristic of age, but the newness of change is less frantic or scary than it used to be. I’ve been through significant change more than I can count at this point, so the thought of leaving campus to head out into the real world isn’t so intimidating.

It is, however, intimidating to many of my classmates—most of whom are 14-15 years my junior.

Attaining a BA in English Lit has been wildly different than my first go-around with college. Instead of pursuing a degree in my early twenties, I went out in the world confident that I could do without one. This was true to an extent (I certainly could have committed to numerous career paths outside of a degree of some sort). The truth is that choices are limited without a slip of paper to get into other fields. With some luck, I was able to return to to college in my thirties, which was a radically different experience. Instead of being concerned with forming an identity and the constant anxiety of who I fit in with. I was free to do the work–which was the benefit of working in all those odd jobs: Showing up and completing a day’s work is the extent of responsibility. In the many years I spent working as as a freelance writer, in advertising, and as a preschool teacher, I found there was a common theme with every workplace and its hierarchy of people and rules: Every place is different and there’s no telling what it’s like until you’re in the thick of it.

Call it life experience or wisdom from age, but the road one takes is always going somewhere. In my experience, there isn’t much need to worry about where you’ve come from.

That’s why I’m always taken aback by the epidemic of fear of failure pertaining to test scores/assignments/papers and final grades. In the logistical sense of applying for scholarships (money for tuition), grades matter, but this concern is always insulated—no one outside of college cares about grades other than which university you acquired them from.

I spoke with a classmate in my thesis class who was convinced that the rest of her life was dependent on our professor’s decision pass or fail us. “Our professor has the power to decide what happens to me, doesn’t that scare you?” she asked me.

No. Of course not. That’s because college is another season of life—and like most seasons, you experience them while they occur but without much memory for when they change. Do you remember last summer? Vaguely, I imagine. Your recollection likely goes something like this:

“It wasn’t very hot, it was nice to get outside, and I went to the beach a few times.” 

Right, which isn’t very specific. You’ve moved on and forgotten. College, like last summer, will be faintly memorable like the fading tan that’s in desperate need of more sunlight.

As I’m finishing the final month and a half of classes, I often think about getting back into the real world. It’s true that college has been a strange bubble existence with its own set of rules and expectations apart from the real world. However, the value of college has been a place to harness skills, think about the world in unconventional ways, and to truly expand the mind. The tragedy of graduation, I think, is that the faucet of knowledge is suddenly turned off and it’s all the harder to keep exposed anything challenging preconceived notions about the world.

Workplaces, families, friendships, and social media all make it incredibly easy to fall into a community of practice that insulates itself. There’s no more need to pick up a textbook, read studies, or cram for a test the following morning. There is no longer a forced path to unwittingly follow to betterment. In college there was (with its due criticisms, of course), but now there’s no incentive to keep going. Post-graduation means to adapt to a new world, one of employment and promotion, of hierarchy and financial makeup, of integrating into social systems that lead to that next stage of adult life.

Seasons change, I suppose.

I’ve yet to hear who the commencement speaker will be at Grand Valley State University, but one thing is for sure: This person will be older, experienced, and will likely give wisdom to those too young to understand the full impact of what’s being said. That’s natural—I’m just now learning things that I wished made sense a decade ago, and I’m confident that I’ll feel the same way about things I wish I had known at 35 in another ten years. Whatever this speaker will say to 2024 graduates, I can echo my own sentiment:

“Appreciate the seasons.”

They come and go. The leaves wilt, the snow accrues, and the muddy puddles of spring will evaporate into the paradise of summertime. It all changes so fast, but the lesson wasn’t in recognizing that seasons come and go—it was in spending the time to notice them in the first place. 

So, when someone asks about last summer or what it was like to be in college, time travel back to when that place felt real again. Summer meant sunshine, and college meant glimpsing a world that appears a wondrous, complex organism–one that was never simple to define.

It’s much like the weather this past week: Summer and winter existed within 24-hours of each other in Western Michigan. I don’t truly understand anything.

I appreciate the seasons that remind me of this.

***

A NOTE ON AI GRAPHICS

Some of you may have noticed a distinct stylistic change in Weekly Post-Ed graphics form the past two weeks. There’s an obvious reason for that—they were designed using AI. And while I am naturally opposed to making graphics using AI, the past few weeks of trying out the technology has been fascinating. Viewing an image generate after transcribing a few sentences into ChatGPT might be the closest I’ve come to witnessing magic on the internet (not counting a few TikTok trends). An image is produced in under ten seconds with a level of detail that might take me hours to illustrate.

There are downsides, however. The design choices this current AI makes in graphics generation are very limited in my opinion (in terms of a flat, cartoony style), which makes it easy to identify images made with AI. There’s also a lack of authorship with the images, something that isn’t easy to explain, but something about the images feels lacking. If that makes any sense. Call it artistic integrity, but I can see the difference in something made by humans and not. There seems to be a lack of personal choice with AI generation.

All of this is to say these graphics are a short term experiment. I do not intend to rely on AI for graphics going further. The graphic designer in me will not tolerate the loss of originality with my own creative works.

So, that about explains it. Count on more personalized graphics going further, but every once in a while, if the graphic is interesting enough, I may use elements of AI as inspiration (which, frankly is where the technology thrives).

***

  1. “Hush” by The Marías
  2. “idwtgtbt” by the booyah! kids
  3. “I Gotta I Gotta” by flowerovlove

***

Wishing everyone as well as you can be. You’re not alone out there,

March 6, 2024 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
| Weekly Post-Eds |

Weekly Post-Ed #62

by Robert Hyma January 24, 2024
written by Robert Hyma

“I’M A DICK BEFORE I AM.”

I’m currently in my last semester to attain my Bachelor’s Degree in English Literature. After two years of attending classes, I’ve realized there is a tipping point for when one has been at college TOO long.

It came when reading a textbook, of all things. As I was reading opening chapter, I suddenly thought, “You know, this is a REALLY GOOD textbook.”

[planet earth exploding]

A textbook? I was inspired by a textbook. That’s like being inspired by the text of Apple’s Terms and Conditions agreements. “Hey, these are really well written, you know that?”

But maybe I’m not being fair. If you read the textbook, you might also agree that it’s pretty damned good. Here’s what happened next:

The textbook in question is from a linguistics class called Language and Gender: Second Edition by Penelope Eckert and Sally McConnell-Ginet. Essentially, the class is a sociolinguistics course—which is academic babble for how language shapes society. This class, in particular, explores how language has impacted ideas about gender from a historical and cultural perspective. 

The first chapter started with a bang with this argument: Gender is a social invention.

It was incredibly convincing. In thirty pages, the authors of the textbook broke down what it is like to be raised to taught, observe, and otherwise value deeply entrenched gender standards that reach back as far as civilization is concerned. I’ll save the research section for those interested in pursuing the subject, but one piece of evidence has stuck with me:

Infants as old as two-days-old change the pitch of their cries based around if a caregiver is male or female. It’s a slight change in pitch, something measurable only with a fine instrument, but the change is readily observed.

By the end of the opening chapter, I felt like I was yanked out of The Matrix and awoke in a tub of pink goo. I subsequently wondered why it had to be pink and not blue goo, the sort that boys would prefer in a dystopian human-battery plant, but that’s beside the point. 

I spent the following three days casing over how environment has influenced my identity, ideas, likes/dislikes, relationships, career decisions, music tastes – in short, everything. 

By the end of the week, I wasn’t sure of who I was anymore. Was I just a pair of eyes and loosely working system of neurons that has absorbed advertising and consumerist ideals on a scale on an unconscious level? Am I just a mimic for all that has been told or taught to me?

I had turned into a Gender-focused Renée Descartes, pondering if my existence was a figment of some demon’s oddly white male and patriarchal imagination.

Descartes, for those foggy on the famous philosopher, would soon conclude of his existence: “I think, therefore I am.”

But I couldn’t keep the record from skipping when it came to environmental influences. I kept asking myself, “If I ask a girl out and have no idea how she’s been subjugated for a lifetime of unequal treatment, does that make me a dick before even saying hello?”

My conclusion was similarly Cartesian, but slightly different: 

“I’m a dick before I am.”

By the weekend, I was exhausted. Trying to piece together your life by considering EVERYTHING EVER is a little like dumping the entirety of your household belongings in a big pile in the living room and asking, “Ok, but what does it all mean?!” It’s a stupid thing to do all at once.

Admitting defeat, the only thing I could do was pick up the textbook and continue reading. 

That’s when I found a rather surprisingly passage from the authors. Instead of accepting the dystopian future we’re all headed for, they wrote something unexpectedly uplifting about the nature of social systems—for those in apparent control and everyone else. This is what they wrote:

“While social structure and available resources provide constraints, it is people who decide just how constrained they will allow themselves to be (and others who try to enforce or help loosen those constraints)…We do not forget that on a day-to-day level, style is not usually a serious business – rather, it is the spice of life.”

Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2013). Language and gender (Second Edition). Cambridge University Press. 48.

The pile that was my life that I had dumped on the floor was suddenly cleaned up. 

It was like hearing the famous conclusion of Renée Descartes, “I think, therefore I am”, but with a lemony twist on top, “Plus,” the great philosopher might have added, “it’s more fun that way.”

It’s a much more liveable way of existing, don’t you think? I’ll rephrase: 

“I style, therefore I am.”

 ***

AGDQ 2024 FINALE, HURRAY!!

This past week was the bi-annual speedrunning charity marathon event Awesome Games Done Quick. For those in the know, it’s a charity marathon streaming 24/7 on Twitch.tv for seven days that features a slate of video games being beaten as quickly as possible. The event draws tens-of-thousands of viewers and raises obscene amounts of money from a community of dedicated gamers and fans of games for a great cause: The Prevent Cancer Foundation.

I’ve watched the marathon every year and it continues to impress with speedruns that showcase the toughest tricks without a hitch. And while that is masterful to watch, there is something deeply inspiring when watching something go wrong and how one responds to it.

There was no better example than the finale of AGDQ 2024 when the final run hit a “snag” that had to be figured out in front of a live audience. The runner, Zic3, needed to level up a character in Final Fantasy V: Pixel Remaster, but the only fight was something his roster of fighters were greatly under-leveled for. The result was watching twenty minutes of frantic trial and error as the runner and his Couch Commenters (FOXYJIRA and W0ADYB) conferred back and forth for how to beat this section of the game.

It was the most inspiring example of grace under pressure I have seen in a long time. While the host, PROLIX, kept the audience riveted by reading donations, Zic3 eventually found a way to progress back to the route and complete the run. There were no tears, no gripes of rage or blame, not even a helpless moment of hesitation. The three runners on stage huddled together to solve the problem and eventually found a way through.

There’s something vulnerable and revealing when things go wrong. For me, it showed just how incredible these runners were to focus with all the pressure and continue to work the problem, each contributing solutions.

I’ll link the moment in the video below. It’s worth a watch.

And congrats to another AGDQ for raising 2.5 million for the Prevent Cancer Foundation.

***

  1. “This Time Around” by Beauty Queen
  2. “Skyline” by Hembree
  3. “Fumari” by Peach Tree Rascals

***

Wishing everyone as well as you can be. You’re not alone out there,

January 24, 2024 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
| Weekly Post-Eds |

Weekly Post-Ed #54

by Robert Hyma May 3, 2023
written by Robert Hyma

THANKS FOR JOINING US

“Robert! So good of you to join us,” she said. 

Or he said. 

Really, anyone who had a turn to come up and say hello at church after I hadn’t attended in a while used to say this phrase to me. I’m not sure why this specific passive-aggressive line was used by literally everyone who came over to shake my hand. Maybe it was rehearsed. I like to think a group gathered to collectively agree about how best to subtly insult someone who hadn’t been present at church in several months, and that there must have been other phrases that didn’t quite make the cut:

“Glad you could make it this time!” | (Pretty good, but perhaps a little bitter)

Or: “I thought you were dead; I’m glad to see you’re not! Ha ha ha.” | (Maybe a little too much wishful thinking mixed in with that one)

“Didn’t you grow out of puberty years ago; why do you need to sleep in until noon in your twenties?” | (Oddly specific and definitely NOT autobiographical)

And I would smile, trying not to squirm from the cold, clammy hands of the elderly ladies, or the overly aggressive, bone-breaking squeezes of the elderly men. I smiled because there was nothing for me to say: 

They were right to point out that I had been gone for some time without any explanation.

The explanation was simple for me. I was off living a life that required my being elsewhere to fully live it. The fault was in assuming I could return to a place where I supposed there would be no difference in opinion from when I was last there. In fact, I expected a warmer welcome—like a guest hosting SNL or that nod of gratefulness from librarians after returning books to the library after years of being overdue (definitely NOT another autobiographical detail).

There wasn’t any excuse worth giving. I didn’t feel a need to explain myself. I was back. And I was excited to get to the real conversation. 

“You look taller, have you grown?”

“Have you lost weight?”

Yes. And, yes I have. Thanks for asking.

“Glad to be here,” I’d say, smiling through clammy or overly aggressive handshakes, relieved the good part of the conversation could finally begin. “I’ve been busy.”

Truly. Here’s what I’ve been up to:

***

MARIO’S MOVIE

Image courtesy of Universal Pictures

A little behind the times, but I had some thoughts on The Super Mario Bros. Movie.

Quick side review: The movie was excellent! There were so many easter eggs and musical score references to previous games layered throughout the movie that really could only be appreciated by fans of the longstanding game series: The score included pieces from Super Mario 64, Super Mario 3D World, Luigi’s Mansion, Yoshi’s Island, and so much more. The voice-acting immediately made sense once Mario (voiced by Chris Pratt) said his first lines, and the likes of Luigi, Bowser, and Princess Peach came to life in ways that the games hadn’t touched upon in franchise history. This was truly a movie for generations of fans to come together to get another view of Mario and company in a new way. Mario truly warps to an interconnected world featuring arctic regions (with snowball launching penguins), dangerous lava pits, overgrown mushroom stalks, rainbow roadways, and even a land of rampaging apes (including Donkey Kong and kin). By the end of the movie, there was a call for more: More Nintendo franchises to appear, more worlds to explore (including Mario Galaxy references throughout that included a comically depressed celestial starlit, Luma, that hinted at the eventual introduction of Rosalina). 

The Nintendoverse appears to be getting started, which brings a slew of stories that stand apart from the usual superhero canon that has so saturated moviegoer imaginations for the last decade. It’s an added bit of fun, a twist on nostalgia that was both needed and appreciated by generational audiences. It was a movie made with love by fans of Super Mario for fans of Super Mario.

 And not to mistake it: This was a movie made for the fans.

For critics, on the whole, did not appreciate The Super Mario Bros. Movie.

Underneath the joy that fans emoted during the movie, there was a discord of critical review. The Super Mario Bros. Movie scored incredibly high by fans but poorly amongst critics. After having watched the movie, I understand critical arguments that were made about the film: There wasn’t a groundbreaking story, nor was there much emotional depth with any character; and the stakes appeared low as it was clear Mario would save the day…give or take a few extra lives along the way.

And yet, I wholly disagree with just about every critic that scored the movie as subpar.

Where critics lost objectivity in their reviews was in assuming that “good” movies consisted of essential story tentpoles: a rich backstory, high stakes, emotional growth, and a surprising but inevitable conclusion. It’s true that these features are lacking in The Super Mario Movie, but anyone who left the theater thinking the film a failure missed the point.

A movie can be greater than its individual parts—traditionally acclaimed story elements included.

The magic of the Super Mario Bros Movie sparked from its delivery of nostalgia. The movie was a celebration of something so beloved, and by so many, that the fact it exists in a way that compliments the original experience of the video games is a testament to a different kind of satisfaction. There was much more working in the movie than those basic arguments critics were making.

It reminded me of good cooking, and so I thought:

“Story doesn’t necessitate a good movie, much like a prime cut of beef doesn’t necessitate a great meal: The joy of eating has everything to do with how its prepared, who its eaten with, and if you like to eat beef in the first place.“

I would venture to claim many critics didn’t like beef Super Mario before they sat in their chairs to dine out.

Which is fine. Movies live beyond the confines of bad reviews. And from the joyous applause and laughter and excited anticipation for what Nintendo franchise could possibly appear on the big screen next, I looked around at an audience that was one-third kid and two-thirds adult fans of the Mario games: There will surely be second helpings of this dish.

My critical advice: It’s not too late to acquire a better taste for the games before watching next time. It’s a delicacy to many, after all.

***

COLLEGE, SURVIVAL, AND ESPRESSOS

I’m writing a bit extra in this Weekly Post-Ed to say a little more about what I’ve been up to since I last posted: Hope you don’t mind.

I’ve just completed my first year back to college full-time. Two semesters of attending classes, doing homework, studying for exams…and all at the age of 34-years-old. Everyone that I’ve mentioned my current occupation (“full-time university student”) has said, “I could never do what you’re doing. I could never go back to college.”

After a year’s worth of experiences and tribulations, I can conclude these people are 100% right: Being older doesn’t make college easier because, by design, it’s meant to be survived.

That’s because college is not a series of tests that assess how smart you are, but rather how resilient you are. The amount of information that’s taught in lecture, expected to be read and understood for class discussion with assigned readings, and the gauntlet of tests, essays, and exams throughout a semester is designed for most to flounder. The totality of information aside, the performance pressure students place on that holiest-of-idols, FINAL GRADES, leads to scholarship opportunities that are either accepted or revoked. It’s a painful reality since the cost of college is so laughably high that one wonders why there isn’t a “Tip Your University” screen when paying tuition by credit card—just an added cost to an already paid-for service.

(Of course, one could argue there is a “Tip Your University” feature: It’s called alumni donations.)

I’m writing this as a situated adult, someone who has arrived on the other side of young adulthood. I watched my classmates, undergrads ranging from 18-21, mostly, who worried about campus living, friend groups, where the parties were at, how to get sex (and from whom), and who is older and can score some beer. Many worked side jobs, juggling full loads of coursework as well as 20-30 hours as a restaurant server, cashier, cook, tutor. Many experienced homesickness, many traveling across state to attend and live on campus to survive on their own.

I write all of this assuming we’re all comfortable acknowledging the absolute frantic age of always-connected electronic life we live in. Texts, emails, Google searches, late-night notifications, social media likes, 24-hour news, mass shootings (including a particularly close-to-home tragedy at Michigan State University only a few months ago), the still-present Covid-19 variants running amuck, and a slew of intangibles that are probably worth listing but I’ve run out nerve. The constant draw of attention to devices and crises that are pushed into eyeballs at rapid speed makes for a life unlike what past generations have experienced. 

College feels like a triple espresso, now, instead of a double; just enough to induce a constant state of shakiness that is advertised as the new normal. The body can only take so much, however, which is both literally and metaphorically the case with students today.

College life encompasses all of this, condensed into an ecosystem that demands excellence and flaunts those who somehow possess the superhuman strength to achieve everything on the course syllabus with a 4.0 GPA. Attending college is a Herculean effort, one that tests mettle in ways both arcane and unreasonable. And, I have no problem identifying as someone who had it easier than most. Out of my population of college students, I’m quite privileged. For all the reasons I’ve stated above, I didn’t have to work a side job, nor did I have to wrestle with forging an identity amongst a landscape of raging hormones and brand new adulting experiences like my classmates did. I was solely on a mission to broaden my intellectual horizons and gain a bachelor’s degree: A piece of a paper that equates to, essentially, a deli line ticket acting as an expensive placeholder that says, “I have a right to the working world, too.”

And yet, despite all the setbacks and travel and intensive mental Olympics required to survive each semester, it truly was an invaluable experience being back in college. I have so much more to share, about what it meant to succeed as well as what doesn’t work about current education, but all of that can wait for another time. 

I’m thankful for a break before heading back for a final year. There’s a lot to unpack about these past few months, so stay tuned.

***

Courtesy of CAPCOM

This week’s Weekly Finds features the upcoming Original Soundtrack from Street Fighter 6. The themes of each roster character have been fully revealed and feature a dance-centric, urban catalogue of hip-hop, cultural inversion, and it makes for a damn entertaining setlist to fight to in-game. While the musical direction of Street Fighter 6 has bristled many fans of the series who wished for a more traditional remix of song selections from previous titles, I’ve quite enjoyed the new direction for this iteration of character themes. Below are YouTube links to a few favorites I’ve had on repeat lately:

  • Cammy’s Theme – “OverTrip”
  • Ken’s Theme – “Spirit of the Flame”
  • Blanka’s Theme – “Zilra Zilra”
  • Jamie’s Theme – “Mr. Top Player”

Of course, if you’re a fan of the original character themes circa Street Fighter II, here’s a walk down memory lane orchestration by Games and Symphonies! Enjoy!

***

Wishing everyone as well as you can be. You’re not alone out there,

May 3, 2023 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
| Weekly Post-Eds |

Weekly Post-Ed #51

by Robert Hyma January 12, 2023
written by Robert Hyma

KUDOS DONE QUICK

Image via gamesdonequick.com

By the time you read this, Awesome Games Done Quick 2023 will be halfway over. If you don’t know about Awesome Games Done Quick, here’s the TL;DR: it’s a 7-day video gaming marathon packed full of speedruns raising money for charity (for this event: The Prevent Cancer Foundation). Old favorites ranging from Super Mario Bros. 3 to Crash Bandicoot 3: Warped, as well as newer games such as Stray and Pokémon Legends: Arceus, are beaten in record time to the delight of tens of thousands watching online, and all for a great cause.

For me, the joy of watching AGDQ isn’t so much about basking in the nostalgia of games from childhood, but of watching something completely new. There’s bound to be something you’ve never seen before at AGDQ. So far in the marathon, the biggest surprise was a game called Fashion Police Squad, a DOOM-esque shooter where a police officer fires a fashion gun and warrants justice to all the “fashion crimes” done in his city: Men wearing baggy suits and tourist dads with socks with sandals around the city, and so much more. The lighthearted and humorous gameplay made it an instant favorite of the event.

Of course, the most notable aspect about AGDQ 2023 was the brave and necessary stance of event organizers in response of two measures recently passed in the state of Florida, the seminal location of AGDQ for over a decade.

In a statement on the GDQ website, the reasons for canceling the live event in favor of an online-only format shortly before this year’s event were thus:

“While we would love to return in-person, we’ve determined that to provide a safe and welcoming event to all, it was best that we move away from our originally planned location in Florida.

Given the state’s continued disregard for COVID-19’s dangers (including anti-mandate vaccination policies) and an increased aggression towards LGBTQ+ individuals, including the law colloquially known as “Don’t Say Gay,” we do not believe it is a safe place for our community at this time…”

The full statement has since been removed from the official GDQ website due to the site’s overhaul while covering the event, but the full statement can be found on Kotaku’s website here.

It’s the kind of decision that makes me proud to tune into this event year after year. GDQ has always been a beacon for the gaming community and has since shown support through action that community matters more than politics and taking a financial loss. This year in particular, I’m proud to donate.

There are three days left to check out the marathon (outside of the quick uploads from the GDQ YouTube Channel in case there’s something you missed!), but here is a short list of runs I’m still looking forward to:

***

CONSPIRACY THEORIES LITE

The more I continue this reentry into college, the more I dislike the idea of the English Major. I’m nearly through with this first week of classes of the semester and am reading from three different sources: A Norton Anthology, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain, and a novella called Faces in the Crowd by Valeria Luiselli. 

If that sounds like a lot, it is.

Not because of the reading (which, if you’re an English Major like I am, you better like it) but because I’m tired of this rapid-fire “Hey, diagnose this thing you just read! Immediately!”

After every thirty pages of a novella I haven’t read before, I’m asked to scour pages, looking for themes and symbols as though I’m Robert Langdon from The Da Vinci Code. Never mind the rest of the novel; we can’t be bothered to finish it before finding MEANING. And once we find MEANING, all will be right with the world.

Not really, but maybe the stakes in an undergrad course feels reminiscent to that. Personally, I’d rather finish a new novella and digest it for a second. This process of diagnosing a longform piece of writing every 30-pages feels like stopping a movie every twenty minutes, turning to the person next to you, and asking “What do you think the movie is about?”

How about we just finish the goddam movie first?

The art of literary criticism is very boring, and more than I’d like to comment on with this Weekly Post-Ed. And if you’re asking, “Then, why be an English Major?” Well, seeking a degree to read more stories has its downsides. It’s a bit like having children—you love them more than you can express…but dealing with shit is just part of the job. Literary criticism can be a way of better engaging with stories, but most often criticism is show-and-tell for academic types. Where else can a critic say without inducing comas in a public place, “Hey, I know the REAL reason the author wrote this book!”

Literary criticism, really, is just Conspiracy Theory Lite—less sugar and calories than the real thing.

Of course, if you informed the author or writer of your genius piece of criticism, they would probably shrug, smile kindly, and say, “That’s fun. Now, please go away. I have a life to live.”

I assume I’m one of those “real” writers when I leave class each day. I shake off the literary critic I pretend to be, put away the ceaseless conspiracy theories that are somehow college credited, and I go home to write something.

Hopefully it’s something good. Most of the time it’s not.

You just hope that, eventually, something decent gets on the page.

That’s my own working conspiracy theory, anyways.

***

  1. “This City Reminds Me of You” by APRE

***

Wishing everyone as well as you can be. You’re not alone out there,

January 12, 2023 0 comments
1 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
| Weekly Post-Eds |

Weekly Post-Ed #48

by Robert Hyma November 5, 2022
written by Robert Hyma

WALKIES AND TALKIES

While I haven’t finished my first playthrough of one Mario+Rabbids: Sparks of Hope, there is a major aspect of the game that stands out apart from gameplay and that is the cutscenes. Cinematically, they are fantastic. However, the biggest gripe I’ve had with the game has to do with usage of dialogue. 

In the original Mario+Rabbids: Kingdom Battle, the only character dialogue outside of the usual Mario-esque sound effects of “Woo-Hoos” and “Yeah-Hahs” of Mario and the others comes from our player-controlled and Roomba-esque robotic guide: Beep-0. Oftentimes, his lines were humorous as well as informative, acting as the main character from which we explored the world of Mario+Rabbids. Beep-0 was our translator, explaining with whimsical observation the eccentricities of the invading Rabbids in the Mushroom Kingdom. 

Fast-forward to the sequel and things have changed. Everything is bigger, shinier, a bit more fleshed out thanks to the success or the original. Now, instead of the adorable character grunts and groans sound effects, many characters are given voiced lines. These lines often take the form of runners, or a series of words that begin a line of dialogue before cutting off as the rest of the line appears on the screen in a dialogue box. This is a tactic that highlights certain words like characters and places or funny reactions, and it’s just to give characters “a little extra” characterization.

I do not think this works for a very specific reason.

Long ago, I enjoyed the LEGO videogames. Because of a lack of budget or what-have-you, characters in LEGO games (LEGO: Batman, LEGO: Star Wars, LEGO: Indiana Jones) did not have voiced lines. Instead, the game was portrayed through glorious silent acting with cartoonish stunts, pantomime, and comical sound effects. And it was marvelous! In an industry saturated with voice acting to drive plot and story forward, here was a series of games that did not need it. Fans knew the story of Star Wars and Indiana Jones, and even the unique telling of a Batman title was not lost on young fans who understood that bad guys were bad, and good guys were trying to stop them.

LEGO Star Wars

Voiced lines did not add to the complexity of the story.

Eventually, all the mainline LEGO titles inserted voiced lines of dialogue, changing the dynamic of what made those earlier games great. Instead of a pantomime, slap-stick driven version of pop culture movies and stories, there was cinema experiences with LEGO characters acting out all the parts.

The formula was inversed and, I’d argue, for the worse.

Unfortunately, the same propagation of voiced lines has begun to erode on the Mario+Rabbids series. If there are more titles in the future, I imagine that with the influence of the soon-to-be released Super Mario Movie that is monstrously dubbed over by Chris Pratt (yeah, not my Mario either) will do away with all sound effect grunts and “Woo-hoos” for voiced lines.

That is, until huge public outcry reverses the cinematic fantasies of Nintendo and the disillusionment that all characters must speak lines to appear more likeable. Then, things may revert to their original voiceless harmony.

I’ve enjoyed Mario+Rabbids: Sparks of Hope tremendously. The other parts of the game aside from creative voice direction makes for a wonderful world to get lost in. However, this one sticking point of “More is Better” with voiced lines of dialogue is not always the case.

Sometimes it changes the nature of what was charming and unique in the first place.

What do you think? Are voiced lines given to normally voiceless characters making for better gaming/movie experiences? As always, I love to read your thoughts in the comments below!

***

BREADCRUMBS

I haven’t written about my ongoing college experience since it began. It’s wild to think I’ve sat through college lectures for ten weeks already. The last that I wrote, I had a tempestuous relationship with a professor who called me Bertie (and still does). My impression of this professor was that he was a performer, someone who spoke to the class like an actor reaching the nosebleeds at the Kennedy Center. He’s charismatic, melodramatic at times, and peculiar in a way that means his tastes for music and culture has not evolved over the past three decades.

I was critical of this professor because I thought he was a chauvinist.

Ten weeks into the semester, I find my initial reactions were true, but there was something else going on that I was unaware of. Strangely, I’ve found his classes are the ones I try hardest in.

In trying to pinpoint why, I think there are two important causes for this uptick in effort. The first is that this professor isn’t boring. Loud? Sure. Boisterous and erringly peculiar? Absolutely. But boring? Not in the slightest. This professor has hidden depths when it comes to the material, and even if his musings about how the novellas we’re critiquing in class often fall on ears too young to understand the ramifications of age and tragedy, it’s clear that he is trying to open up worlds that would be left unexplored.

So, yes, he is a beloved professor by just about all his students because of this charisma.

Perhaps most impressive about this professor is something he performs very technically during his lectures. Where most professors lecture with an air of superiority over students, this professor often stops his train of thought to ask a trivia-esque question. These questions can range from anything like, “Who was the philosopher who coined ‘I think, therefore I am’?” and, “What’s the name of Voldemort’s snake again?”. By doing this, the professor wakes up the class. Everyone is attentive, more involved, and voices speak up to answer the obtuse.

Why?

Breadcrumbs.

This professor is laying breadcrumbs so that we’ll all follow along. Inserting a batch of trivia questions every class that are loosely related to the lecture is like a quick game of sudoku or a New York Times Crossword—something to dust off those old neural pathways and bring up morale.

Not only is it a refreshing break in the pacing of a lecture (which are often monotonous and droning), but it feels good. He’s empowering his students. He’s allowing them to feel more confident so that they might answer the larger conceptual questions that are being asked.

Like a Pavlovian trained dog, I find myself salivating for these trivia questions every class. They’re fun, I feel like I’m smarter than I likely am by answering them, and everyone feels connected and heard trying to figure them out.

I’ve been pleasantly surprised after ten weeks with this professor. I’ve learned that even if my first impressions have remained correct in sizing him up, those impressions are not the totality of what is happening.

The more I attend classes, the more I enjoy seeing the 3-Dimensionality of this place. It’s something I didn’t notice a decade ago when I first took college courses.

***

  1. “666” by Jeremy Messersmith
  2. “F*ck It I Love You” by Oh Wonder
  3. “Smoothie” by corook

***

Wishing everyone as well as you can be. You’re not alone out there,

November 5, 2022 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
| Weekly Post-Eds |

Weekly Post-Ed #44

by Robert Hyma September 7, 2022
written by Robert Hyma

HANGMAN

There was a classmate playing a game of Hangman in front of one of my classes and I hated him immediately.

            Which isn’t fair to write about this kid, but I’ll explain my reaction:

            Usually, the professor strolls into class as the bell rings (a metaphorical one—there isn’t a classroom bell on a college campus), which means that the punctual among us sit in silence before he walks through the door. It’s dead silent before class, either because no one is familiar with each other, hesitant to start conversations that would be obviously eavesdropped upon should they start, or that everyone is on a phone perusing social media apps in place of real-life experiences (as we all do). 

            This isn’t uncommon practice. Most of my classes feature this lack of conversational atmosphere. It’s deathly silent in the preceding minutes before class starts.

            Except for when I walked into my class last Friday.

            There, stationed at the whiteboard was a sandy-haired, twig-thin literature type adding the last limb to a stick figure dangling from a crookedly drawn gallows, signifying that he had just won a game of Hangman. I perused the words that had so stumped the two or three other participants that played (the rest of the class had their heads down and didn’t give a shit).

O B F U S C A T I O N

M A L F E A S A N C E

“T O  D R E A M  I S  T O  D I E”

             I made the last quote up, but he had something just as obscure and niche. The point is: where there was silence – despondent, antisocial, un-spirited silence – now there was a game of Hangman hosted by a literature fan showing off his vocabulary and knowledge of little-known quotes.

            And I thought, “Oh, f*** you.”

            Here’s why:

            There’s a difference between enthusiasm and ego. Regarding this game of Hangman, were the words chosen to loosen up the class, to get people talking? No. Did this guy choose words or phrases that might draw a laugh or cue some recognition? No. The words were obnoxiously chosen and the quote was obscure and meant nothing to anyone else. This was a game of vanity, of ego. This guy was showing off how smart he was and to get a little attention by playacting cavalier at the front of the class.

            Not only was the game an eye roll, but then this guy took pride in winning the game! Of f***ing Hangman! I know this is true because he laughed with glee when the two or three other classmates offered up guesses (with the same enthusiasm as an employee reluctantly volunteering to clean out the toilets at a grimy diner, “I guess I’ll do it. Is there an ‘A’?”). This game of Hangman was proof of wit.

            Which incurred another silent, “Oh,  f*** you,” as I took my seat.

            I then felt guilty. How old was this literature enthusiast: 18, 19-years-old? Why was I responding so harshly? Was it because I secretly wanted to rile the class, to spread my influence as a seasoned 33-year-old who understood how to NOT be like a pompous academic? And, honestly, if I had tried ANYTHING like this classmate of mine, it would have backfired anyway. I would have been like a parent that “tries to be cool” and my efforts would have tanked just as hard.

            So, maybe I needed to let up. Let this classmate be pompous and gleeful. He’ll grow out of it. After all, wasn’t he trying to break the ice? He’ll learn how to NOT be a tightwad in the future, I thought.

            The next thing I knew, the metaphorical bell rang for class and in walked the professor. He examined the whiteboard, which still had the game of Hangman on it for some reason (all the better to have the professor admire your prowess of recalling English words longer than 8 letters, I guess).

            “Obfuscation, malfeasance,” listed off the professor, rubbing his chin and considering the terms. “I’m going to leave this up, today. I’ll write things on the other whiteboard. Looks like a great game of Hangman was had here. Great vocabulary, whoever was playing.”

            All my previous patience and understanding went out the window. “Well, f*** you, too,” I thought.

            Therein was the cause of my classmate’s misplaced enthusiasm: a professor that enabled academic pageantry.

            For the next minute, the professor and twiggy classmate bantered back and forth, pitching even more obnoxious words to stump future players with.

            And I, with a herculean effort to resist groaning, sat in the back of the class, content with my omniscient view of the world, knowing how truly cringy the past five minutes of class had been.

            At least I wouldn’t ever degrade myself like my classmate had, I thought.

            I, after all, had dignity.

            “Alright, let’s take attendance,” said the professor. “Bertie? Where’s Bertie…ah! There you are. How’s it going Bertie?”

            The professor was still calling me Bertie. (Read more about it here.)

            “Good,” I answered the professor with a sigh. I proceeded to draw my own game of Hangman on a fresh sheet of paper. I couldn’t figure out the last letter of my own game, though.

            Maybe you can help me fill it in?

***

WATER WITCHES

            This was irresistible to write about.

            There’s a family neighbor in northern Michigan with a truck drilling a water well that is still in the front yard. The truck has been there several months, the well digging deeper and deeper without any luck. Either water has been undrinkable or there hasn’t been enough to act as a well for an entire household.

            My mother adds to this piece of news, “They should hire a Water Witch.”

            “A what?” I asked.

            “That’s not what they’re called, but that’s who used to find spots to dig wells.”

            “Explain,” I said. I couldn’t wait to hear this.

            “If you were looking to dig a well out by a farm, you’d hire a Water Witch. The Water Witch would look around for a tree branch, shaped like a Y, and when he found a good one, he’d wander around the grounds and wait for the tree branch to start shaking.”

            (It turns out you can use just about anything, but most modern Water Witches – yes, this is still a thing –  prefer using two metal rods.)

            “Go on,” I said, almost drooling with anticipation.

            My mother shrugged. “Once the stick is shaking, that’s the spot you started digging a well.”

            “And this worked? People really dug wells like this?”

            “Oh, sure. They were hired all the time.”

            “These people were hired?!”

            “Well, yes. They were never wrong,” said my mother.

            My father put down his mug of coffee. “Of course they weren’t wrong! It’s Michigan; if you dig deep enough, you’ll find water no matter where the branch starts shaking.”

            “Oh come on,” said my mother, egging him on, “Those tree branches really shook.”

            “Because the guy was shaking it himself!”

            “You don’t believe that do you?” asked my mother with a coy smile.

            And while the merits of the Water Witch were playfully debated by my parents, I had a renewed sense of hope in humanity. If a Water Witch was really a paid position in the history of American farming, then I can see no better future for a people who were creative enough to shake a stick and say, “Dig your well here, Farmer John.”

            Entire neighborhoods had wells dug on such foundations.

            Kind of gives you a tingly feeling of pride in grassroots American history, doesn’t it?

            For your viewing pleasure, I’ve attached an article about Water Witches from Time Magazine. Apparently, they are still sought after during droughts, particularly the dry season in California. I won’t spoil the end of the article; it isn’t a very long read.

https://time.com/11462/california-farmers-are-using-water-witches-to-make-your-two-buck-chuck/

***

  1. “Earth Worship” by Rubblebucket
  2. “Seize The Power” by Yonaka
  3. “Bird Sing” by Anna of the North

***

Wishing everyone as well as you can be. You’re not alone out there,

September 7, 2022 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
| Weekly Post-Eds |

Weekly Post-Ed #43

by Robert Hyma August 31, 2022
written by Robert Hyma

BACK TO COLLEGE

I’ve made the decision to head back to college full time to finish my BA. This meant quitting my job as a preschool teacher and heading back to a university as a 33-year-old. Over the past few weeks, I’ve had many anxieties about what it means to be, on average, 12-years older than everyone else attending an university. So, as the first week of classes is nearly at an end, I thought I’d bring you through some of my adventures from the first week of the semester.

***

THE LAST TIME I WAS HERE…

            Having a decade between stints of attending college full-time, I’ve had a chance to reflect on how things went in my early twenties.

            In short: it wasn’t pretty. 

            I’m sure there were successful moments, but as I was lying awake in bed, waiting for the sun to rise on another stint as a full-time student, I could only recall the things that were of particular embarrassment. Here’s a few of them:

  • I once emailed my Astronomy 101 professor, someone whom I greatly admired, and asked why he wasn’t more famous in his field. I wrote to him, “You seem so capable. Why are you a professor at a community college instead of conducting research at an observatory, or at NASA?” 

            I meant this in earnest, but in hindsight I can see this translates to: “Why are you a loser in your field?” It never dawned on me that not everyone rises to the top of prominence because they want to. There is such a thing as luck and academic politics to consider, as well as geography (observatories aren’t nestled in the farmlands of West Michigan, typically). Never mind family responsibilities, his general expertise, or if he wanted any part of that burgeoning astronomer life (in which, I imagine, consists of a series of Friday nights staring at the stars and uncorking bottles of champagne as new coordinates are punched into the sensitive instrumentation of the observatory telescopes—a real party scene amongst scientists. This isn’t accurate in the slightest, but I can dream).

            The professor never responded to my email, which was gracious in hindsight.

Here’s another:

  •  I once woke up late for class and drove in a sleepy haze to campus, running to class only to find a classroom full of strangers there. The professor, whom I had also never seen before, said in all this confusion, “Can I help you?”

            “Sorry, I’m late,” I said, and proceeded to find an empty seat to sit down.

            “Uh, I think you’re in the wrong class,” said the professor.

            “No, I don’t think that’s right,” I said, still in a sleepy haze. “I think you all are.”

            Imagine: an entirely different group of classmates, an unknown professor, and YOU are the one telling the class THEY are in the wrong place. I was like a theater director telling the cast to stop the performance because they were performing the wrong play.

            Just imagine the confusion, which, was probably the same look as everyone else in the class who stared at me.

            Eventually, I emerged from sleepy usurping and realized how wrong I was. I stood up, probably bowed politely (as all the crazies ought to do when they politely leave) and sped out of the classroom. I looked to my watch and saw that it was exactly an hour before I was supposed to arrive for my first class.

            How could this mismatch have happened, then? It dawned on me:

            I hadn’t adjusted the clock in my car to Daylight Savings Time. In my sleepy stupor, I referenced this clock on the road, in which I thought I was slightly late for my class instead of an hour early.

            Oops.

            I later learned that the class I had interrupted was a Psychology 101 course. In hindsight, I figure I gave them a real-life case study.

            So, you’re welcome, Science.

            These and other memories came to mind, but I’ll spare the others for now. It was time to get out of bed and begin another stint of full-time university life at the age of 33.

            Little did I know, things hadn’t changed much.

 ***

‘RACE CAR’ SPELLED BACKWARDS IS ‘STUDENT PARKING’

            Ok, not really. “Race Car” spelled backwards is “Race Car” (as opposed to the old Bugs Bunny joke: “Mud spelt backwards is Dumb”). Strolling through the parking lot towards campus, I noticed cars lapping the already filled parking spaces. That’s because students arriving later in the day might as well have been driving race cars around an elliptical raceway. Most student commuters do laps around parking lots, waiting for a parking spot to open up. This could take hours, so if you’re observant enough to stop and watch the traffic, you could be treated to a miniature Indianapolis 500 in Lot B2. Most students want parking spots up front to limit walking (Hiss! The horror!), so the route most cars follows looked like this:

Student Parking Route

Many spots open up towards the back of the lot, which results in the route being changed to this over time:

Student Parking route over the course of many hours

            Needless to say, there were multitudes of classmates missing during my classes, most of them hemmed into bumper-to-bumper traffic, awaiting the rescue of pit crews to help change tires from the wear and tear of driving laps around the Lot B2 raceway.

***

CLASSROOM SEATING

            As I sat down for my first class, I recognized a distinct pattern in where everyone chose to sit. Most students clustered to seats along the exterior, lining the walls and keeping away from the middle aisle. Maybe it’s a social anxiety, but I like to think my classmates pick seats pretending there’s a massive canon pointed directly at them from the head of the classroom and they are taking cover.

            Most professors enter class right as the hour starts, so they wander through this patch of uninhabited seats, wondering why students avoid the middle of the classroom. Then, the professor takes attendance aloud (this is for the first few days until they are familiar with names, then this task is silently done). It is then obvious why there are vacant seats: 

            This is where the professor looks while lecturing. He’ll look to you for acknowledgement, to make sure ideas are setting in.

            It’s unwanted attention and no one wants to be looked at as though they are about to be called forth for jury duty.

            Everyone bows their head as though to say, “Just look somewhere else, please!”

            Well, most keep to the outer perimeter except for a few yuppie students sitting towards the front who adore the professor and want to impress the room with some witty banter.

            And after a few, “Hey, I’ve had you in one of my other classes, right?” and “You’re an English major? I’ll have to get you in touch with another professor I know. He’s into that obscure novel you’re reading, too, haha!”, one can’t but hope for a literal canon to blast the room to smithereens.

***

QUAKING QUAKERS

            The center of campus has an impressive clocktower in the middle of a circular walkway. The opening day of classes invites student groups to get a head start with recruitment, so many organizations set up tables to hand out fliers, hold sign-ups, and invite passersby to attend upcoming events. On my first day, I passed a set of photographers that offered to take a “First Day of School Photo”, which led to a five-minute pitch session on attending a prayer group held on Thursday nights.

            It’s a entrepreneur’s world on the first few days of class.

            Towards the afternoon of my first day, I passed by the clocktower where a pair of older, potbellied men offered pamphlets to join a Quaker campus group. To the discontent of one of the students passing by, he turned round and shouted at the Quakers, “You don’t know anything about Quakers! Quakers take a vow of silence on Sundays!”

            “Ok, do you want to talk about it?” asked the potbellied Quaker passing out the pamphlets, probably to calm the outburst. “Do you want to talk?”

            The disgruntled student turned around and shouted, “Yeah I want to talk! BECAUSE you don’t get it!”

            I stopped to listen into the oncoming argument.

            “Quakers QUAKE on Sundays!!!”

            I nodded, happy about the gift of a great soundbite, even if I had no clue what it meant. Quaker’s quake? Are they fearful on Sundays? Are they literally shaking wildly to appease their God? I couldn’t help but wonder.

            This led to a rabbit hole of other religious acts based on names.

            “If Quakers quake,” I thought, “do you think Christians christen?”

            I liked the idea of Christians gathering on the docks of Lake Michigan to formally bless the launching of boats. On Sundays, they would smash champagne bottles against the hulls of anyone renting at the marina.

            I decided I like being at college if I could hear more things like this.

***

IT’S BERT, NOT BERTIE

            By 3 PM on the first day of classes, I thought I made it through the first day without any major embarrassment. I hadn’t emailed a professor to ask why he wasn’t more successful in his field, nor did I enter another classroom to accuse everyone of being in the wrong place. As my last class started, I thought fortunes had changed for me; maybe I had ceased to do stupid things.

            Nopity. Nope. And nope.

            I have a professor twice in a single day—once in the morning and in the late afternoon. In the morning session, the professor called my name for attendance with little mind, “Robert Hyma?” and he marked me present as I raised my hand. In the second class, he called my name and stopped with recognition, “I have you in another class, right?”

            “Yes,” I said, hating every moment of conversations that happen in front of other people. I could feel all my classmates watching.

            “Robert, is it? Is that what you want to be called?”

            Blame it on the monotony of the question, or that I felt there was an audience, but I wanted to play with this notion. “I can change my name to anything?”

            “Sure,” he said.

            “My friends call me Bert,” I said, feeling brave.

            “Bertie? They call you Bertie?”

             “No, Bert,” I corrected. “Bert. Just call me Bert.”

            “Bertie?” He asked again. “Ok, I’ll call you Bertie if you want.”

            Bertie, which isn’t close to sounding like the name Bert, by the way, was the worst interpretation of my name I’ve ever heard. Luckily, another classmate, a girl I can’t remember, chimed in. “He’s saying Bert, like as in the second part of Ro-Bert.”

            “Oh,” said the professor. “I kept hearing Bertie for some reason.” He smiled through awkward laughs around the class. “Side note,” he continued, “the reason I kept hearing ‘Bertie’ is because I have a grandma named ‘Roberta’ and that’s what we call her: either ‘Bob’ or ‘Bertie’ for short.”

            “Oh,” I muttered. “I wish I would have known that two minutes ago.”

            “But alright, I’ll remember,” said the professor, and moved on to the next person with attendance.

            Thank God, I thought, reflecting on the lesson I just learned: next time, just say your normal goddam name.

            “Ok, I think that’s everyone,” said the professor, concluding attendance. “I’ll try not to babble this afternoon like I did in my morning class. I don’t know what it is about the first day, but I just can’t stop from gabbing at the start. Was anyone in my first class that saw me? Bertie! That’s right, you were there. I just couldn’t stop talking, could I Bertie?”

            Not even a hint of recognition from the guy. At first, I thought he was screwing with me, saying the absurd rendition of my name as a joke, but I was wrong. He was searching my face for recognition, to give credence to his anecdote about the morning class. “Sure,” I said, not knowing how to handle the fact that for the rest of the semester I might be called Bertie.

            “I promise I won’t do that this time,” said the professor, and then he went on to show us a documentary about American Whaling that showed in vivid detail how sperm whales were hunted, harpooned, stripped for parts, and the carcass thrown back to sea.

            I sat there watching the vivid description of whale murder and thought, “Motherf***er! Now I’m Bertie.”

            Oh well, beats my last name, which is often mispronounced. To my confusion growing up, teachers often called out Hyma (Hi-mah) but added an ‘N’ to the end for some reason, making my name ‘Hyman‘. This always drew laughs, and I didn’t realize why until high school when it was explained to me that a ‘hymen’ was a part of female genitalia. People like to laugh at the guy who had a last name that was associated with the vagina.

            At least my first name wasn’t “Dick”, which would have caused people’s heads to explode (I’m sure there’s a sexual innuendo joke in that sentence somewhere).

            So, since my first name has now mutated into Bertie, I suppose my faux full name is Bertie Hyman, which roughly translates to “A grandmother’s vaginal tissue”.

            Hard to live that one down, but it’s a long semester.

            More adventures will surely follow. 

            Stay tuned for more…

***

  1. “The Walk Home” by Young the Giant
  2. “Maybe You Saved Me” by Bad Suns & PVRIS
  3. “No Place I’d Rather Be” by The Wrecks

***

Wishing everyone as well as you can be. You’re not alone out there,

August 31, 2022 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
| Weekly Post-Eds |

Weekly Post-Ed #12

by Robert Hyma May 25, 2021
written by Robert Hyma

Rogue Planets

            Want to know my biggest fear? It used to be bees. Whenever one buzzed around my ears, I ran away like a bombing raid was sounded and I needed to hide. I suppose this is because I’ve never been stung, nor do I intend to be. It seems that the things that haven’t happened scare me the most.

            Most of my fears are celestial. A beam of gamma rays from a quasar finally reaching the earth and cooking it alive is terrifying to think about. Solar flares, storms on our sun that could flicker the atmosphere, that could fry protective layers of oxygen and nitrogen…yeah, that s*$% is scary.

            All of these fears are unlikely to occur in the grand scheme of things. But along with basic insecurities (“Did I say the wrong thing? Why don’t these people like me?”), the unlikely things are what keep me up at night.

            My biggest and most real fear, by far, is something hidden in the darkness. A rogue planet, soaring through the solar system unannounced and undetected. Why? Because these star-less worlds are out there, in the pitch of the cosmos, soaring through the dust and debris of space. Should one of these planets collide with one in our solar system, the entire balance would be disrupted. Orbits rely on the gravitational hold of our sun, but also other planetary bodies. This disruption, this slow receding from orbit, being kicked out of the solar system…

            Yup, this is my biggest fear.

            And never mind a planet! What about a star racing through our celestial neighborhood? The star doesn’t have to make contact with anything, just pass by close enough to pull on the planets with its gravitational influence. The result would be a slow and imminent trip away from the sun as our orbit widened and the earth slipped further and further into the greater cosmos.

            Terrifying, right?

            That’s why I love thinking about my fears. They are exciting stories with gripping narratives. Why do you think so many stories are written about zombies, world-wide destruction, horror, and grand governmental catastrophes? One of the best stories anyone could write is the thing that horrifies them the most. 

            Like rogue planets and stars.

            There happens to be a wonderful video that explores the circumstances of a receding earth done by the team at Kurzgesagt. Along with cosmological concerns, Kurzgesagt posts all kinds of videos ranging from nuclear winters, mental health, and the safety of drinking milk (to name but a fraction of their content).

            Check out the video below to see my greatest fear illustrated with bright and cheerful animation. 

***

Literary Revue

Muskegon Community College’s Literary Publication

            At a coffee shop in Grand Haven, I flipped through my local community college’s literary publication that was available for purchase at the counter. It’s a yearly collection of essays, poems, and short stories. I paged through the selection of stories, reading quickly, and was immediately bored. 

            I couldn’t figure out why.

            These stories likely weren’t bad or in poor taste, just not resonating with me. In this way, I’m reminded that short stories really are like songs; you either like them or you don’t. Maybe there was nothing wrong with what I was reading, or I was reading writers who took too long to get to the point. Some were too emotionally explorative, like the writers’ feelings were mannequins that stood in place of characters and events in the story. Some paragraphs had startling disconnects between the narrative and what a character was physically doing.

            For example (not from the literary publication, of course):

“Samson felt a blackness, a feeling of nowhere, and the universe itself could not combine any array, any pattern of atoms to make him whole again. This spatial divide was all-consuming, and the further his mind raced away from the present, the deeper the pitch became. He was errant, alone, and mortified at his existence…

So, he bought an ice cream cone. It was tasty. He liked the sprinkles the most…

            Perhaps not as erudite an example, but how does buying an ice cream cone resolve or continue with what we’ve just read? Does it continue the theme of losing one’s soul? Does an ice cream cone denote that only the lost buy those sorts of treats?

            Perhaps ones with sprinkles. I don’t know.

            Either way, I wasn’t connecting with the story and this bothered me. I wanted to champion these stories, to see the building blocks to something greater for young writers.

            But instead, I was left wondering this: who am I to judge these stories?

            Whenever I have criticisms of other writers, I turn the argument back on myself; what do I really know? Maybe what I write is just as trite, or that someone else would think so of my work. I can easily believe that. I like my stories, but who is to say I’m not delusional or oblivious to why they are just as bad? Maybe I like what I write and that’s all I know.

            Never mind that, look at pedigree. Have I really earned the right to say I’m a published author, here’s my advice, and all should listen to it? No, of course not! I would never impose my experiences as anything to follow. All I do is post stories on a personal website on the internet, something anyone with a blog and completed draft of a story could do. There’s no gatekeeping system, no one to flag what I write and say, “Hey, how about rewriting this section…” The only standard I adhere to is my own—and, hopefully, it’s high enough to challenge the writing process with every new thing that’s written. 

            That’s all I have to go on.

            So, while it’s easy to pick up a yearly literary collection (and a college one at that, written by young people; because who is proudest of their writing when they were younger?) and start nitpicking, I don’t really know what I’m talking about. I just know how to write like I write. By claiming that I know something else, something more, I’m trying to justify that all the years of built-up experience, all the writing that is done through instinct alone, must mean more than the other guy.

            Which is ridiculous.

            I only know how to do as I do things.

            That is the essence of anyone’s craft.

            And it’s also why I generally keep my mouth shut when I have criticisms.

            Like Socrates, I also know that I don’t really know.

***

  • “Spaces” – Kuinka
  • “Donna” – Rubblebucket
  • “I Am Steve” – Hey Steve

***

Wishing everyone as well as they can be. You’re not alone out there,

May 25, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Keep in touch

Facebook Twitter Instagram

Recent Posts

  • WP#76: The Mysterious Case of the Embittered Speedrun Critic

    July 13, 2024
  • WP#75: Q&A with the Last Neanderthal

    June 28, 2024
  • WP#74: The Time Traveler’s Dilemma

    June 21, 2024
  • WP#73: My Journey with Destiny 2

    June 13, 2024
  • WP#72 The Show Goes Wrong

    June 6, 2024

Categories

  • | Essays | (1)
  • | Playlists | (9)
  • | Short Stories | (11)
  • | Weekly Post-Eds | (77)
  • Graphics and Logos (1)
  • Instagram
Footer Logo

2025 - All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by PenciDesign


Back To Top
Robert Hyma
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Library
    • Short Stories
    • Graphics and Logos
    • Playlists
  • About
  • Contact
  • Portfolio